This post is based on the article: A brief rant on the future of interactive design by Bret Victor November 8th, 2011.
I found this article today, posted by some of the members of The Graphic Designers of Canada in their email forum. The things I like about this article are numerous. One, it is visually stunning. I always loved mixing typography with image, words with pictures, and Bret Victor does this with style, simplicity and functionality. This is likely why I became a graphic designer, so I could shift between the symbol and the representational, all in the space of five square inches. As a child, I read a lot of books, yet the excitement I would feel about a picture book, or one with demonstrative illustrations was way beyond reading books with pages of blocks of text. In my 20s, I read mostly non-fiction, again, it could have been about the pictures and diagrams more than a disinterest in story telling.
Another thing about this article I like is the discussion of invention. I am constantly thinking of how to invent things, either what the thing would be, what it would look like and how it would work, and the how to get it out into the market place, or at least off the drafting table graph paper. Here is a quote from Bret Victor, “…This matters, because visions matter. Visions give people a direction and inspire people to act, and a group of inspired people is the most powerful force in the world. If you’re a young person setting off to realize a vision, or an old person setting off to fund one, I really want it to be something worthwhile. Something that genuinely improves how we interact.” Visionaries, dreamers, inventors, are they all able to harness the force he suggests they possess, or maybe that possesses them? Do people actually chase these visions as often as we think they do? Also incredibly important beyond the courage to chase is the funding for inventions and innovations. I like that he believes young people can be the dream machines, and older people the ones to buy the fuel for all those moving trains. It is practical, and I also like practical.
Hands. The article is basically about hands. Another thing I think a lot about is function and form. Chicken and egg. However, look at things and people closely, and you will see how the form is connected to the action, purpose, energetic expression of the object. And as a sculptor, my hands are so happy to move in all the different ways and have the strength to actually manifest a three-dimensional object. It is rugged, it is physical, and it makes me feel joy and relaxation. We as a culture however, seem to be moving towards what Bret calls the ‘Pictures under glass‘ technology, which derive the hands and finger tips of anything but the smooth, glassy surfaces of technological devices. His reasoning is touching you could say, as it is a call to remain human, fully conoscente of our hands intended purpose. That perhaps we need to rethink the direction of our technology or risk losing the sensitivity of our fingertips.
Another important thing I like is his understanding of how culture and societies evolve. In his words,
“The most important thing to realize about the future is that it’s a choice. People choose which visions to pursue, people choose which research gets funded, people choose how they will spend their careers.
Despite how it appears to the culture at large, technology doesn’t just happen. It doesn’t emerge spontaneously, like mold on cheese. Revolutionary technology comes out of long research, and research is performed and funded by inspired people….With an entire body at your command, do you seriously think the Future Of Interaction should be a single finger?“
Choice and change. I have already reflected on these and think about them a lot as well. I also realize I could be more grateful to the inspirational people who make research and innovation a career. As an artist, I can see we have a lot in common.







